Similar Posts
Memorable Singing Scenes from Science Fiction Movies
If there’s one genre of film I love, it’s science fiction. If there are two genres I love, they are science fiction and musicals. So you can imagine that during the very rare occurrences that…
Six Ethnic Mobs and Their Portrayals in Movies
There are literally dozens of movies that depict the culture and lifestyle of criminal organizations, particularly those in which ethnicity is required for membership. Whether you refer to them as the mob or the mafia,…
Disney Princesses Illustrate the Seven Deadly Sins
We’ve featured a lot of artist’s renditions of Disney Princesses, and have also covered the seven deadly sins to some degree, but the two have never met. Until now. From DeviantArtist Chill07 comes this excellent…
A Look at James Cameron’s Career as a Director Through Movie Trailers
I did this once with Tim Burton, so why not again with the guy who’s just dominating right now, James Cameron? Cameron’s career is notable for two main reasons. The first is that he simply…
One Comment
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All I have to say is thank you. I’ve studied Kubrick in college for several projects now, and he is one of my favorite directors, and I thank you for the gallery, and thank you for saying the truth that no one wants to hear. We can tout a lot of modern filmmakers, but damn . . . when you watch a movie in, say, the 70s, and you see how each shot is painstakingly set up to use reflections, colors, and movement to capture not only what is supposed to real, but what these people think, feel, and what they are going to do – without saying a word – it becomes very obvious that type of filmmaking is dead. There are some filmmakers from time to time that use some of these old standards (Paul Thomas Anderson is one). We can’t settle for calling every big movie a classic anymore, our standards are too low. But yeah, makes me sad. 2001 has so much detail in it it’s rediculous. Man, I miss those kinds of movies.