Three Cultural Touchstones Ruined By Time


“Timeless” is a misleading word.  We tend to apply it to things that we really like, without really considering what the word actually means.  In reality, it’s a pretty high bar.  You’re talking about a work that transcends time, whose themes are so universal and whose characters resonate with such clarity that they stretch across the ages and affect you with undiminished power in the here and now.

Note that, before you skim the rest of this article and proceed to the comments section to lambaste me for hating on The Princess Bride, that it’s actually a good example of something that is itself timeless.  It’s a fairy tale, the characters are archetypes, and it’s a self-contained world.  It has aged, and will continue to age well.  It’s a good standard to hold others against, which is why it’s the lead picture.

But what are some other beloved cultural icons that don’t age well?


Well, here’s one for you.  Despite the fact that without fail, every cool girl I’ve dated has been majorly into The X-Files at one point or another, it’s a show that doesn’t really stand the test of time.  Despite Mulder’s often grandiose voiceovers about the nature of existence, the tone and scope of the show are far from universal; the shadowy Cigaratee Smoking Man now seems like less of a veiled, all-too-well-understood threat, and more like a caricature.  The idea of The Black Helicopters and what they represent – alien conspiracies, vast plots to do strange experiments on people – is just no longer at the forefront of our cultural consciousness.  Instead, as Edward Snowden has shown, you don’t need to get all that crazy.  The villains of today are much more mundane, though equally as scary when you really think about it.

The idea that aliens might implant a chip in my head is a vague, grandiose fear.  The idea that the NSA is using Angry Birds and my YouTube history to create a personality profile of me is a little more alarming, albeit a touch less outright evil.

But really, that’s a smaller issue than my real issue with The X-Files, which is, in a word, pace.

This is what I felt like watching the first season of The X-Files:


That’s more of a facepalm, but it’s also what I look like when I’m trying not to fall asleep.  There’s an episode in the first few seasons – I’m not going to take the time to look it up – where Mulder is searching for someone in what looks like an abandoned shipping depot, and it’s super dark and he’s got his flashlight, and there’s tense music while he creeps around in the dark for what feels like an hour but in reality is only 3:21 which is still an insane amount of time for nothing to happen in a TV show.

I like deliberately paced things.  Let The Right One In is my favorite movie ever, and it’s downright glacial at times.  The key is it’s building towards something; every quiet moment adds something to the whole.  With The X-Files, it’s like they felt an obligation to fill at least 15 minutes an episode with lots of stumbling around in the dark while tense music plays.

Let’s be clear, I’m not saying it’s a bad show.  In fact, certain episodes are plain awesome.  But it does not stand up well over time.  Someone trying to get into it right now, without the benefit of nostalgia, is going to have a tough time.  You’ll probably have to preface a lot of your pitch with “If you just get past X…” or “Just tough it out until Season 3…”

Moving on, let’s talk about another cultural staple.


I swear this show had a plot.  Didn’t it?  When we all watched it 20 years ago, weren’t there characters, or things happening?  I’m not claiming this was a good show, but I swear I remember it actually being a TV show and not a Victoria’s Secret magazine in TV form.  Yes, even then we knew it was all about the slow-motion running, but now that we have Game of Thrones we’ve learned you can have gratuitous nudity AND a plot, so what the hell was this show?  Go ahead and put on an episode of Baywatch and tell me you’re not literally embarrassed.  And speaking of Game of Thrones making shows look bad…


It’s impossible to watch Xena now and not see the wires showing.  You can’t knock a show for dealing with the technology of its time, the circumstances of its budget and the role of the network, but there are all kinds of ways to tell a story in a creative way using scant resources, and Xena kinda failed at that.  You watch this show today, and having been bathed in the complex, master craft-level storytelling of something likeoh, The Wire, it’s pretty hard to watch.  At every turn, you see the compromises they had to take to tell the story they were trying to tell, and it’s not a very pretty sight.

Compare Xena to Buffy, and while yes, Buffy’s fight scenes look incredibly cheesy these days, it was never really about the action.  Xena had those long, ponderous expositions that were supposed to give the epic fight scenes some weight.  But time has ruined this one; it’s impossible for them to have weight given how much the seams are showing.

So, gentle readers, now that we’ve covered some TV shows in the past, what do you think of the current crop and how they’ll stand up to time?  My intriguing pick for one that might not is The Wire.  So much of it is about the verisimilitude of the city, the whey they walk, and talk, and act.  The word authentic gets thrown around a lot, but it’s apt.  And that authenticity depends on our ability to recognize it, which might go away as the culture changes.  Or it might not – after all, the story and characters are among the best we’ve seen, the themes and discussions near-universal.


Similar Posts


    1. 24 is a great call. I kind of doubt it. Maybe some aspects of it will stand up, but especially watching a bunch of episodes in a row it has a bit of the “bending over backwards for the sake of plot devices” thing going on.

  1. “Note that, before you skim the rest of this article and proceed to the comments section to lambaste me for hating on The Princess Bride…”

    Guilty. The moment I read the article title and saw the Princess Bride photo there I already had a half page rant drafted in my head before I caught the disclaimer.

    Well played.

  2. Both “Timeless” and “Dated” can be misleading, maybe more so the former, as in a sense, the latter can still sort of be a thing – any TV show mentioning, say Windows 98, shows it’s age (unless it’s meant to be a flashback) because most people will have updated their computers to more up to date software, and then updated again, and again. So from that angle, it is “dated”, but is it really?
    Ultimately, whether or not something ages well is based on our own views on the show, if it’s something we still love over time, it’s “timeless” if we can’t see the value in it enough to look past where it doesn’t stay up to date, then it’s “dated”, but when you think about it, even shows that have obviously dated moments can still seem timeless because the overall storyline of the show, still seems relevant to day.
    Take Friends for example, if you ignore the odd piece of dialogue, such as any mention of technology, one mention of seeing a band live (due to what happened after the concert, not the fact it was an old band), and the fact no one mentions Facebook, Twitter, or anything like that, and just keep the rest of the show as it is, pop culture, and celebrity references and all, and you get a show that (to me) hasn’t aged. I have actually found that for the most part, it is very easy to pretend that Friends is a show that was made very recently, rather than in the 90s-00s era. All the pop culture references to mostly current bands and movies of the time, become nostalgic mentions of bands from the past. Basically, I’m saying that if Friends had been made now, then it would be the same show, with the same references to 90s-00s stuff, but with references to current stuff thrown in.
    However, even without that piece of imagination into any show from the earlier decades, we can still find a show timeless if we love it enough, even if it looks like it hasn’t aged well by the so called “dated” technology, or whatever (in my mind, references don’t date, because there’s always going to be knew fans of something) it can still age well in our minds for other reasons.
    Ultimately, I think anything can be timeless in it’s own right, even if it’s also (for want of a better term) dated, even by just a little, as the past is still relevant, and there’s always new people our there to discover it again. After all, I am replying to a two years old article. 🙂

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.