Unreal Movie Review: Dredd

It was just another day of eye-rolling Hollywood news when it was announced that the latest film to get the reboot treatment was going to be Judge Dredd. If it was popular once upon a time, and it isn’t Star Wars, it can be remade for modern audiences.

Lately, mid ’80s to mid ’90s action movies seem to be all the rage, with Total Recall getting an update, and a new Robocop film on the horizon. So, what does Dredd have to set itself apart from the “yet another reboot” category of films? Well, it’s actually pretty damn good.

It’s not just good actually, it’s far and away a vastly superior movie to the original. Yes, Judge Dredd will always have its place in movie history for its ultraviolence and the goofiness of Sylvester Stallone yelling things while wearing an ill-fitting helmet, but the film, even for the mid-nineties, was not a well-made movie at its core.

That has changed, however, for the 2012 update now starring Karl Urban as The Law. Here Lionsgate threw mass appeal to the wind, and tried to produce the best possible film they could make, one that stayed closer to the original comics. Judge Dredd doesn’t belong in a PG-13 universe, he needs to be lighting people’s faces on fire with incendiary bullets. He doesn’t need to be Matt Damon, or have Scarlett Johansson following him around. Rather the team of the stoic Urban and the fresh-faced Olivia Thirlby (best known as “that girl who was Juno’s friend”) is more effective than any recognizable A-list combo could have been.

Urban simply makes Dredd the true badass that he could never be with Stallone wearing the mask. The costume update goes a long way in this, but the absence of Stallone’s trademark speech impediment certainly helps as well. Though Urban remains helmed for the entire film, his mouth etched in a permanent frown, he’s actually a more intimidating costumed hero than, dare I say it, even Batman appears on screen.

Truth is, Dredd and Judge Dredd have little in common other than the same dystopian universe they occupy, a helmet that has to obstruct their vision and the titular character’s name. This is indeed a reboot, not a remake, and the plot isn’t remotely close to the original. Rather, the film has Dredd and new recruit Anderson (Thirlby) responding to a distress call in a slum super-scraper that houses 75,000 of society’s poor and criminals. The tower is run by a ruthless drug dealer name Ma-Ma (Lena Headey) who is manufacturing a drug that justifies 3D scenes in movies. I mean a drug that makes time slow down for the user.

After she murders three junkies, Dredd and Anderson show up to investigate. When she sees them take one of her lieutenants for questioning, she locks the building down and sends her army of gang members to hunt down the two Judges. With no backup, they must survive the assault and bring her to justice. Justice, which in this world, is almost always death.

The film taking place almost entirely in one building does work, but it’s a bit worrisome if you saw another badass action flick this year: The Raid. The Indonesian film has a special forces team invading a highrise owned by a drug dealer. They also must make their way to the top, fighting gang members as they go, and the plots are too similar not to notice if you’ve seen both films. Sure, Dredd has no kung-fu, and is not a stylized martial arts flick, but it’s an identical plot. Not to say it’s stolen, but I think the film could have been better served making use of the rich dystopian world outside of a singular building. But hey, that’s why they have sequels, I suppose.

That said, this is an incredibly well-made action film. The fight sequences are gory and almost reminiscent of Headey’s 300 at times. Director Peter Travis has come a long way from the rather awful Vantage Point, and by making this film as gritty as possible, he’s scored a win in the genre. Another similarly-themed comparison might be Die Hard, another story of a man trapped in a very tall building where he has to shoot a lot of bad guys, though Dredd executes the same mission with a lot less humor.

It’s stylish, slick and almost…sexy at times, if that adjective can apply to a bloody action movie. It could have easily been a bargain bin rip-off, but in truth, the film is far more enjoyable than the one that inspired it, unless you enjoy Stallone’s incomprehensible Judge in an ironic way.

All reboots are not created equal, and Dredd manages to be a cut above the rest .

4 out of 5 stars

Similar Posts


  1. “It could have easily been a bargain bin rip-off, but in truth, the film is far more enjoyable than the one that inspired it, unless you enjoy Stallone’s incomprehensible Judge in an ironic way.”

    You’re going to catch so much flak for this statement. It’s a comic book, they were inspired and stayed true to the spirit of the COMIC BOOK, completely abandoning the “Schumacher”-esque 1995 movie travesty.

    I saw it this Saturday, and was actually amazed. I’ve been waiting for a fun, dystopian action romp that doesn’t insult my intelligence. I liked that the telepathy wasn’t overpowered, and the mind-invasion scenes were done better than any X-Men movie.
    The female characters weren’t marginalized or weak.
    Judge Dredd himself had that stonewall attitude. He didn’t ham it up with dialog, and didn’t Bale-voice it. The scowls, and some of the lines were simply epic.
    Unfortunately, I didn’t see it in 3D, because I was going to see it alone and wanted to save a few bucks, but I heard the 3D was actually well done.

  2. When I first saw the teaser for this I rolled my eyes and thought of the barrel Hollywood has thoroughly scraped to the bottom of.

    Then I saw the trailer and I had to admit it looked pretty cool, but trailers can make anything look good.
    So to see all these positive reviews is a surprise but to be honest it’s nice to see a film that was predicted to be a crapbox turn out to be more than just its concept or title.

    I doubt I’ll see it in the cinema but I’ll definitely check it out on dvd.

  3. I agree I was pleasantly surprised when I was finished watching this movie. I definitely deserves a potential sequel. I too was a little bummed to see it take place in one setting so hopefully is there is a sequel, they will visit some other locations of the city next time. Great movie!

  4. Holy crap, this review was difficult to read. The unnecessary adverbs, confusing structure (referencing Die Hard a paragraph later was pointless; also BadAcid confused what you were saying probably due to bad reading comp, if not odd sentence structure), and the bothersome op-ed interjections (again, what BadAcid is referring to) are all unbecoming. Sure, they seem like minor issues. But it’s difficult to trust the opinion of someone who seems sloppy in their prose (not saying you are, but you might wanna tidy up).
    An editor could fix a good portion of these issues. Just saying.

  5. Wow, I actually thought the movie was going to be horrible, I am sure many other people did also which is why it only grossed $6 million this weekend. Maybe it will discourage the studio from making more reboots and rehashes

  6. Just saw this movie yesterday. I went in thinking it wasn’t gonna be great, and man was I wrong. I honestly had no problem with the movie taking place in one location. Rather than a weak story spread out over too much space, they kept it tight, and made sure everything was right. A 200 story apartment complex is plenty of space for an action movie, and they explored it perfectly. The space felt big, and having an open atrium made it feel epic. You could feel the scale of the fight that Dredd was walking into.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.