Frankensteining the Perfect Horror Movie
Plot:
For this we need to go with The Exorcist. Take the familiar and make it unfamiliar. Take the safe and immediately make it unsafe. Also, take taboos and turn them on their head. Religion, sex, death. Anything that has the potential to make people squirm is worth playing up.
Remember, this is a HORROR film we are trying to build here, so people being freaked out or horrified or incredibly uncomfortable is OK. We are trying for that.
The Exorcist is that one movie that most people see and just spend the rest of the rest of their lives terribly freaked out by it. People look back on watching the Exorcist with the same shuddering discomfort that people do when they think of that really creepy bus driver they knew when they were a kid who was always looking at them a bit too long.
Does picking the Exorcist mean I think the movie should about possession? No. I am picking the Exorcist because filmmakers need to approach their horror in much the same way that this film was. Take the audience OUT OF their comfort zone and never allow them to step foot back in it.
They may have only shown it on screen for milliseconds at a time, but it stays with you.
In short: Attack early and often. Keep the viewers unsure of what is coming, but make sure they know they are uncomfortable with it before it comes. Try to keep everything contained to a few sets, usually the the more claustrophobic the feeling, the more tense it is for all of us when we watch it. Also, taboos. Lots of taboos. Nothing is safe in horror, and nothing should be.
Ending:
This is where I will lose most of you, and I am OK with that because I stand firmly behind this choice. Martyrs. Don’t worry, I will do my best to avoid spoiling it here for you whom haven’t seen it, but I will speak vaguely of the ending, just so you know.
The end of that movie, for those who understand it or atleast understand it in their own terms, is f****ng brilliant, straight up. It slaps the viewer in the face with an existential question, and then presents us the answer to that question, but not in a way that is so clear that the movie has a solid “definitive” ending. Truth is, it truly does not, and that is what makes it so powerful.
Be forewarned: Actually watching all the way to the ending of Martyrs is no easy feat, but very much worth it.
You can talk to a multitude of people who will have taken something completely different away from that ending than anyone else. To some folks, that might be annoying. Some of you like your endings handed to you in a gift wrapped package with a nice little bow, and a ribbon that explains it all to you, just to make sure. The truth is that movies are very much like music in the sense that everyone should take something different away from a film.
I believe an ending like Martyrs (and another example, last year’s Drive’s) is going to be the next big advance in movies. Movies where the film ends and it is up to you to interpret how the story ended.
Did she or didn’t she talk to God? If I think she DID talk to God, and you think she DIDN’T, doesn’t that in itself make the movie much more vast and interesting? And even then, what did she say and why did she react that way? Yes, the movie ends with questions, but guess what questions do, they incite conversation. So if this movies ending’s goal was to incite conversations, that is a huge kudos from me.
TRUST ME: Make it to the end of this film, it is worth it.
Art that leads to more art is the most brilliant art of all. And if you HATE the existential ending, well, I respect your viewpoint, but a more effective ending I do not know. I almost went with Funny Games again, but I know people hate nihilistic endings even more than they hate existential ones, so I went with Martyrs. My version of the ending to Martyrs is a happy one. How did it end for you?
In short: Take everything you have exposed us to and taught us about the world you built in the last 90 minutes and just bring it to a head.
Take your audience to their limit by testing their perception and making an ending that is still an “ending”, but has the ability for different people to take away different things from it. When an ending like this, you do risk polarizing your audience a bit, but it is worth it in the end, because the people who do LOVE the movie, will make sure everyone else knows that.
Also, twist endings can be dope when they are done right (see FIGHT CLUB) but in horror, they are RARELY done right, so avoid it unless it is an actually brilliant and mind blowing twist (WHAT?! That Dracula is really a WOLF MAN????)
And this would be the final screen, for nostalgia’s sake.
Things To Avoid:
Fake “jump” scares, especially when they involve cats.
False endings where bad guys come back to life one last time.
Over-actors (a huge problem in horror that can ruin even the best film).
AVOID CG, Keep it organic (stick to old school prosthetics and blood packs, trust us).
Yes Jar-Jar, I said AVOID CG. Now back to hell, demon!
Try going for a minimalist soundtrack as oppose to “Scary symphonic music cues”. Those can be jarring, whereas a constant, low hum is far scarier and effective.
Boobs are fun, but if you inundate your film with them, your message will be lost. Unless your message is boobs.
And lastly, PLEASE stop feeling obligated to put a “final boss” in your movies. What I mean by that is, a giant, lumbering CG creation that looks more like it should be in a God if War game than a horror film. That may be the worst offense on the list. It is silly and NEVER works, ever.
A final confrontation in a horror film is necessary, but if your antagonist suddenly “summons” something, that usually comes through the floor or some kind of portal to another world that just happens to be ON the floor, then your film sucks. Or at least your ending sucks. Seriously.
So there it is. The recipe on how to build a perfectly proficient horror film, using all those other horror film scenes as inspiration. The end result would be a horror film with incredibly strong characters, some sort of unbelievably cunning enemy, a perfect soundtrack, perfect pacing and an unbelievable ending. Taboos would be shattered, and so would some people’s subconscious as a result of the film, I am sure. Now the REAL question. Who is going to write it and do I get a writing credit on the piece for inspiring it? Hit me up, we can talk about the fine print.
Nicely written!! Just wanted to comment on one thing. The ending is what always disappoints me. But Funny Games?? Loved that ending. I’ll also try to not spoil it, but the whole movie leads up to one if the best endings I’ve ever seen. You saute through the movie incredibly uncomfortably, hoping for hope. And the last 5 minutes are a weirdly awesome letdown. You’re thinking “ok, I’ve seen a million horror flicks, so when is she…? Oh, um, well there’s that then.”. Knowing what will possibly happen when the credits roll is what seals it for me. Without seeing what happens, yet participating in the previous 2 hours makes it feel as though you are an accomplice to these 2. Just kinda stuck with me.
I haven’t seen either, but were you talking about the original Funny Games or the American remake? I want to see it but don’t know what one is superior. And don’t give me any booster “the original is always better” bullshit.
Also, the ambiguous ending is nothing new so how can it be a big advance in movies? The Thing anyone?
Sam,
Personally I’ve only seen the American version if Funny Games. The ending wasn’t as much ambiguous as it was disturbing. Martyrs had an ambiguous ending that brought up some good questions. Instead of the usual, “is the big bad dead or alive? Or did survivor girl get out alive?”, it seems to really leave the actual ending, and meaning therein, up to you.
@ Sam, You can go either way with Funny Games, because both versions are identical and directed by the same guy. I ALWAYS say go with the original if you can because it seems to maintain a vision, but in this case, note for note, they are identical films, so either will convey the same message. As far as the ambiguous ending, it is true, good call, they have been flirted with before many times but NEVER have they worked as effectively as in Martrys, in my opinion. @ Paul, agreed. This is the second time I have brought up Funny Games on this site, and there is a reason for that. I love the film and truly think it one of only five films I have ever seen that felt like it physically beat me up.
@Remy
You know I really like what you’re bringing to the site. I’m not a big horror fan but I have been intrigued by quite a few of your suggestions. Plus, you respond quickly to comments. Unlike big man Tassi who doesn’t like to mingle with us lowly commenters often 😛
@Sam
I also like that Remy keeps up with the comment section way better than Paul.
I’ll only say that Paul’s been at this for years and has some other sites that he writes for, so it’s not totally surprising that he doesn’t frequent the commments.
Remy’s been writing for the site for maybe a month, so naturally, he’s gonna want all the feedback he can get.
That said, Remy, keep up the great work. I’m loving your articles.
@Andy
It’s just fun to give Paul a hard time.
Hey, screw you guys. I respond to comments. Just kidding I love you. I’ll try to hang out more.
@ Sam, thank you for the kind words, good sir. @Andy, I think you pretty much hit the nail on the head with that one. Paul works his ass off, and I think that is half the reason I was lucky enough to get this gig writing here is because he has such a HUGE load to undertake everyday and wanted to be able to catch his breath. Truthfully guys, I dig the back and forth a lot because the readers will often introduce me to a movie or a graphic novel that I hadn’t ever seen or ever heard of, and I appreciate that. And regarding Paul Tassi, he is a lot like Candyman in the sense that you say his name a few times and^ Bam^ There he is! Hahaha.
I love you too Paul, oh mighty king of our unreality universe. Please don’t have me tortured for speaking ill of you.
Keep up the great work everybody and I’ll keep reading and giving my two cents on a daily basis.
Great Article!
Another suggestion for a great introduction to a movie? A Story of Violence, with Viggo Mortensen…. it’s incredible good.
You’ve got some good taste in horror, my man. Just wanted to 2nd the nomination of Martyrs, it’s one of my favorites and the ending was perfect. I go back and forth between hating Funny Games and begrudgingly respecting it. I like how deftly Michael Haneke manipulates his audience’s expectations and refuses to give them what they want at every turn. And yet, he has essentially made an ultra-violent movie that criticizes its audience for liking violent movies. What an asshole.
Anyway, keep up the awesome posts.
I liked The Collector, because I thought it was really intense all the way through, though the ending was a bit predictable.