Comments on: The Morning Link: 47 Hollywood Ladies in Drag http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2013/02/04/the-morning-link-47-hollywood-ladies-in-drag/ Sat, 25 May 2013 12:14:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Draugr http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2013/02/04/the-morning-link-47-hollywood-ladies-in-drag/#comment-696288 Draugr Tue, 05 Feb 2013 01:11:27 +0000 http://unrealitymag.com/?p=79175#comment-696288 Well, I would agree with that. It COULD count as cross dressing, if you wanted it though.

Obviously, clothes and the gender they are assigned is a social construct.

]]> By: Heche http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2013/02/04/the-morning-link-47-hollywood-ladies-in-drag/#comment-696284 Heche Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:59:11 +0000 http://unrealitymag.com/?p=79175#comment-696284 I wouldn’t even call it cross-dressing. It’s just a bunch of women wearing blazers, as per the trend from a few years ago up till now.

]]> By: Draugr http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2013/02/04/the-morning-link-47-hollywood-ladies-in-drag/#comment-696265 Draugr Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:33:22 +0000 http://unrealitymag.com/?p=79175#comment-696265 This is cross-dressing, not drag. Drag implies a certain amount of caircature and exxageration (ru paul). This would be different than a cross-dresser (eddie izzard, for example.)

The More You Know.~*

]]>