Jan 14 2013

Unreal Movie Review: Zero Dark Thirty

Published by at 12:00 pm under Movies,Reviews

In a world where Homeland and Call of Duty attempt to paint unrealistic pictures of our military and intelligence operations for the uninformed, one man is attempting to set us straight.

Er, one woman, actually.

That would Katheryn Bigelow, ex-wife of James Cameron and phenomenal director in her own right. Two years ago she took home top Academy honors for The Hurt Locker, a stark look at the stress and adrenaline filled life of a bomb tech, and now she’s back with an even more ambitious attempt, the story of the long hunt for Osama Bin Laden.

As an American, it seemed like a pipe dream that we’d ever find the man behind 9/11. He was assuredly in a cave we could never locate or dead with his ashes scattered across the sands to never be identified. But we found him and killed him, and the story of how we got there could likely fill a dozen films.

But here Bigelow only has under three hours. and condenses the data and action into something resembling a more exciting version of three hour History Channel documentary (if they still did those instead of airing Pawn Stars nonstop). Though many dozens and hundreds and thousands came together to find Bin Laden, Bigelow, either based on the facts or the need for a more streamlined narrative, gives a huge share of the credit to one woman, an intelligence operative known only as Maya (Jessica Chastain).

Recruited straight out of high school, she spends the entire duration of her 12 year CIA career focused solely on finding Bin Laden. She starts thrown into the deep end, watching her superior, Dan (Jason Clarke) mercilessly torture an possible terrorist. One bit of information leads to another, which leads to another, and eight years later, Bin Laden may in fact be in sight.

The film is almost weirdly non-political. Bush and Obama are never mentioned by name, and only referenced in passing, There’s not really even a clear statement about whether torture is right or wrong. Many human rights advocates are championing the film, saying that no useful information is shown being given up when inmates are tortured. This is true, however information is gleaned when the interrogators start being nice after weeks and months of constant abuse. It’s unclear whether the same information would have been possible to obtain if it was all five star dinners and friendly smiles from the beginning.

It’s fascinating to see the slow crawl of intelligence over the better part of a decade. There would be nothing but a parade of dead ends for years until one tiny breakthrough that could change everything. The film is interspersed with references to other terrorist attacks, the bombings in London and the CIA meeting with a potential informant that turned out to be a suicide bomber.

During all this we do get a phenomenal performance from Chastain who alternates between resolute and exhausted in the face of her entire agency telling her she’s chasing wild geese. Unfortunately we learn nearly nothing about her character outside of the CIA except one scene where she explicitly states she doesn’t have a personal life. That may be true of many high level intelligence operatives, but for the film’s sake it seems like Maya is less of a character and more of a central, impersonal cog driving the plot forward.

The last segment of the film changes gears into what most paid admission to see, the operation to kill Bin Laden himself in Pakistan. Led by the jovial Justin (Parks and Recreation’s Chris Pratt), SEAL Team Six invades Bin Laden’s compound with nightvision, silenced submachine guns and explosive breach charges. It shows the careful precision with which operations like this take place, but that even the highest priority missions can go awry as one of the billion dollar stealth helicopters crashes to the earth for no discernible reason.

It’s an intense film, though not as much so as The Hurt Locker, which is due to its subject matter. Based on well-known true events, anyone with any knowledge of current events likely won’t be surprised at many turns of the film, as generally you know when a bomb will explode or if a target will be killed. As with many historical films, it’s hard to be left breathless when you know the conclusion, and such is the case here, though that shouldn’t really be held against it.

The film may start out a bit slow, but it starts to snowball over time into something quite exciting. Even if we know the ending, the journey to get there is well told, and no one does military realism quite like Bigelow, that’s for certain. Call of Duty, this is not.

4 out of 5 stars





More Unreal Posts


6 responses so far

  • Michael

    Put this above Hurt Locker which was rife with inadequacies and Jeremy “Dagestino” Renner.

    This movie was really really good. Even my wife, who’s favorite show is Pretty Little Liars thought this movie was fantastic.

    In other years it might be a shoe in for best picture, but there seem to be too many AAA movies out there that the Academy tends to love much more like “Le Mis”.

  • Purd

    Can’t believe this could be anything but 5/5 stars. I was in a trance the whole movie completely enthralled with what I was seeing on screen. Walking out I felt nothing but complete satisfaction with what I think is one of the best movies I have ever seen.

  • jediguy

    It was a very entertaining movie for sure. It’s definitely “Hollywood’s” version of how things happened though. From the main character yelling at her boss and telling him off to the SEALs in the hanger at Area 51. I agree with Michael, Hurt Locker was very inaccurate as far as Military movies go and I was disappointed with it. Also I’m sure the SEAL’s just loved being referred to as canaries and portrayed as goofballs.

  • Sylky_Mcnaty

    and no one does military realism quite like Bigelow…Say what? I havent seen this yet but I hear it is rife with embellishment that is def not realistic. Im with jediguy Hurt Locker was an utter disappointment to me and I was sick and tired of hearing how it was a great portrayal of the military. No it was not as it was very inaccurate, Jarhead was much more realistic in terms of the way it portrayed the Marines. The most recent military movie that has actually showcased military realism was Black Hawk Down.

  • jediguy
  • Ratmonger

    To the Movie’s credit, it does a few things well. The Movie correctly portrays the fact that enhanced interrogation succeeds. Without enhanced interrogation, hundreds of dangerous terrorist murderers would still be free and killing innocent people. The Movie also does a good job portraying our brave Navy Seals at work. As Seal missions go, this one was rather easy. There were only two armed men at the Bin Laden compound, and they were killed in short order. The rest was mop up of women and children. The Movie also correctly portrays the fact that finding terrorists is a team effort, which requires the work of many people and a great deal of coordinated intelligence collection.

    Unfortunately, the Movie fails dismally by suggesting that a fictionalized female character, Maya, almost single-handedly located Bin Laden. This is nonsense. From the moment the first interrogator (not Maya) identified a Bin Laden courier, he was a major focus of ongoing efforts by the CIA and DIA. Moreover, the Movie provides false dialogue stating there were no intelligence assets on the ground near the Bin Laden compound. (Presumably, this was to inflate the importance of the fictionalized Maya character. Interestingly, in Sanskrit, Maya means illusion. Certainly, the inflated importance of the Maya character is illusory Hollywood entertainment.) In truth, there were local intelligence assets on the ground observing the Bin Laden compound for many months or longer. Also, a Pakistani physician risked his life to provide invaluable intelligence on the occupants of the Bin Laden compound. That physician remains in Pakistani prison, after the Obama administration exposed him while bragging about the mission. Moreover, local intelligence assets observed a large, bearded man at the compound, making the identification of Bin Laden almost certain. With their pre-mission surveillance, these assists confirmed that Bin Laden never left the compound, making his presence on the night of the mission almost certain.

    The most preposterous claim of the Movie is that Bin Laden was still an effective Al Qaeda leader at the time of his death and killing him would put an end to Al Qaeda. Since, at least, 2005, Bin Laden had been rendered incommunicado and ineffective as a terror leader. Of course, history shows that, even after Bin Laden’s death, Al Qaeda continues to threaten and kill Americans, including our U.S. Ambassador to Libya and citizens around the world. While Bin Laden was an important psychological target for the American public, his death did not represent a major military or counter-terrorism victory. If anything, Bin Laden’s death and rebirth as a spiritual martyr has given new energy and inspiration to Al Qaeda around the world including, among other things, the Al Qaeda-inspired “Arab Spring.” In conclusion, Bigelow had the talent and resources to make a great movie. Instead, she succumbed to her ideological need to create a silly female lead character and implausible script surrounding her. I wish I had gone to see “Django,” instead.

Celebrity Toob

Celebrity Gossip, Pictures, Videos, Net Worth & Bios

TVOvermind

TV News, Reviews, Recaps, and Spoilers

Categories

Archives