<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate of the Day: Is The Walking Dead a Good Show?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-516270</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-516270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if everyone likes Shane and Darryl because *SPOILERS* they aren&#039;t in the comics and are some of the few things that the show can call its own.  

But yes, I&#039;m happy with this second season so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if everyone likes Shane and Darryl because *SPOILERS* they aren&#8217;t in the comics and are some of the few things that the show can call its own.  </p>
<p>But yes, I&#8217;m happy with this second season so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goko</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-515170</link>
		<dc:creator>goko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-515170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel the same way about the show, hate them all to. Maybe i will finish whit this seson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the same way about the show, hate them all to. Maybe i will finish whit this seson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Avery</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-512388</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-512388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my two pennies worth.

The real problem with the show is the writing. We&#039;ve got some pretty great actors for a TV show, so no problems there.

The locations don&#039;t need to be extravagent, in fact they can be anywhere.

So it all comes down to what the characters do and say and the situations they are placed in. 

Here is the problem. The characters we&#039;re supposed to root for are essentially stupid, and I mean dumb. In the large majority of cases they make their own trouble. Their fate isn&#039;t sewn out in the wilds of a zombie infested world, it is right there inside their own stupid little pea brains.

What the writers should have done to make this program watchable (without us screaming at the TV about how stupid they are, and &quot;what we would have done&quot;) is to place smart characters in difficult situations with narrow choices. 

It is the situation that should be out of their control, not their grasp of intelligence.

It would have made a greater series if they had spent it all just trying to cross a city, with all of the possibilities that could offer. Make it more like 24, where around every corner there are fresh dangers. 

Instead we are left with idiots who lose children, split up to find them, limit who can carry guns, risk taking zombies out of wells when there are 4 other wells, ...I wont go on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my two pennies worth.</p>
<p>The real problem with the show is the writing. We&#8217;ve got some pretty great actors for a TV show, so no problems there.</p>
<p>The locations don&#8217;t need to be extravagent, in fact they can be anywhere.</p>
<p>So it all comes down to what the characters do and say and the situations they are placed in. </p>
<p>Here is the problem. The characters we&#8217;re supposed to root for are essentially stupid, and I mean dumb. In the large majority of cases they make their own trouble. Their fate isn&#8217;t sewn out in the wilds of a zombie infested world, it is right there inside their own stupid little pea brains.</p>
<p>What the writers should have done to make this program watchable (without us screaming at the TV about how stupid they are, and &#8220;what we would have done&#8221;) is to place smart characters in difficult situations with narrow choices. </p>
<p>It is the situation that should be out of their control, not their grasp of intelligence.</p>
<p>It would have made a greater series if they had spent it all just trying to cross a city, with all of the possibilities that could offer. Make it more like 24, where around every corner there are fresh dangers. </p>
<p>Instead we are left with idiots who lose children, split up to find them, limit who can carry guns, risk taking zombies out of wells when there are 4 other wells, &#8230;I wont go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Ward</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-510842</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-510842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did it take 5 struggling people to pull up one little dude out of a well?

Why couldn&#039;t they lasso the well zombie from the outside of the well? 

Did anyone else laugh at the dramatic peeing scene? 

Just a few points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did it take 5 struggling people to pull up one little dude out of a well?</p>
<p>Why couldn&#8217;t they lasso the well zombie from the outside of the well? </p>
<p>Did anyone else laugh at the dramatic peeing scene? </p>
<p>Just a few points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick D Pags</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-510274</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick D Pags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-510274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was worried about this season from the get go, because they fired all the writers from season 1 for some reason. And now I hear that Darabont is gone.

I really hate it when the writing for a show gets disrupted like that.

I remember Heroes wasn&#039;t going too badly until there was a writers strike and after that, lost all semblance of sense.

I am finding it strange that people aren&#039;t outright hating Shane. He&#039;s been close to rape, he told Rick&#039;s family he was dead when that wasn&#039;t true, he almost shot Rick in the back, and now Otis.
The big one for me, because there was no ambiguity about it, was when he had Rick in the crosshairs and was really thinking about it.

I really began to get worried in Episode 4 this season, the zombie in the well just seemed like an addendum to me. It&#039;s like they forgot the concept of the show and tacked on that scene just to keep the zombie fans happy.

I hope it picks up, because this season is meandering like a zombie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was worried about this season from the get go, because they fired all the writers from season 1 for some reason. And now I hear that Darabont is gone.</p>
<p>I really hate it when the writing for a show gets disrupted like that.</p>
<p>I remember Heroes wasn&#8217;t going too badly until there was a writers strike and after that, lost all semblance of sense.</p>
<p>I am finding it strange that people aren&#8217;t outright hating Shane. He&#8217;s been close to rape, he told Rick&#8217;s family he was dead when that wasn&#8217;t true, he almost shot Rick in the back, and now Otis.<br />
The big one for me, because there was no ambiguity about it, was when he had Rick in the crosshairs and was really thinking about it.</p>
<p>I really began to get worried in Episode 4 this season, the zombie in the well just seemed like an addendum to me. It&#8217;s like they forgot the concept of the show and tacked on that scene just to keep the zombie fans happy.</p>
<p>I hope it picks up, because this season is meandering like a zombie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theButterFly</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-509551</link>
		<dc:creator>theButterFly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-509551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m torn. I have been enjoying the show thus far, and I am glad to see them picking up more notes from the comic book in the second season. I guess, they took the often maligned CDC excursion on the chance that the show did not get picked up for season 2. Now they are back on a bit more comics focused path. I guess the biggest knock against the show is the fact that the two most interesting characters thus far in the series are Darryl and Shane who are ether brand new characters or not even around at this point of the comic. The one way that they can bring things back in line, would be to return to what has always been the driving theme of the comic series which is the close character study of Rick and what lengths he is willing to go to protect the group and what individual trials he must face to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m torn. I have been enjoying the show thus far, and I am glad to see them picking up more notes from the comic book in the second season. I guess, they took the often maligned CDC excursion on the chance that the show did not get picked up for season 2. Now they are back on a bit more comics focused path. I guess the biggest knock against the show is the fact that the two most interesting characters thus far in the series are Darryl and Shane who are ether brand new characters or not even around at this point of the comic. The one way that they can bring things back in line, would be to return to what has always been the driving theme of the comic series which is the close character study of Rick and what lengths he is willing to go to protect the group and what individual trials he must face to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubiksman</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-509360</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubiksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-509360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree wholeheartedly that the characters are uninteresting and unlikable.  The one who bothers me the most is Carol, she reminds me of Michael from Lost and how he &quot;Lost his boy&quot;. Shut up, we get it, we&#039;re trying our best, gosh...

The bigger issue on a whole for me is the pacing.  It moves way to slow.  For instance, Carl was all better within three pages of being shot in the comic.  I understand from a TV/Movie perspective that you&#039;ve got to dramatize things, but spending almost a full episode at his bedside is a bit ridiculous.

The should really consider going the 6-8 episode route to tell an overarching story (like season 1), rather than stretching it out for 13 like they are this season.  Not only that but look to the comic to get an idea of how to develop the characters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly that the characters are uninteresting and unlikable.  The one who bothers me the most is Carol, she reminds me of Michael from Lost and how he &#8220;Lost his boy&#8221;. Shut up, we get it, we&#8217;re trying our best, gosh&#8230;</p>
<p>The bigger issue on a whole for me is the pacing.  It moves way to slow.  For instance, Carl was all better within three pages of being shot in the comic.  I understand from a TV/Movie perspective that you&#8217;ve got to dramatize things, but spending almost a full episode at his bedside is a bit ridiculous.</p>
<p>The should really consider going the 6-8 episode route to tell an overarching story (like season 1), rather than stretching it out for 13 like they are this season.  Not only that but look to the comic to get an idea of how to develop the characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliana</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-508254</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-508254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me, what makes this show awesome is exactly the fact that all the character have flaws. None areperfect, and that I simply don&#039;t like any of them (with the exception of Daryl, which is gonna make me dr this show if he dies). I think it shows our own flaws and mistakes as humans beings, and it keeps me wondering if that&#039;s how I would be if there was a zombie apocalypse. We need to consider that there&#039;s not many people in the world that would become a Daryl or a Shane in a zombie apocalypse, they are different and because of that they become what you call &quot;good characters&quot;. But in fact, most of us would become the blonde chick (which I absolutetly despise) or some rick&#039;s wife (crying all over the place).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, what makes this show awesome is exactly the fact that all the character have flaws. None areperfect, and that I simply don&#8217;t like any of them (with the exception of Daryl, which is gonna make me dr this show if he dies). I think it shows our own flaws and mistakes as humans beings, and it keeps me wondering if that&#8217;s how I would be if there was a zombie apocalypse. We need to consider that there&#8217;s not many people in the world that would become a Daryl or a Shane in a zombie apocalypse, they are different and because of that they become what you call &#8220;good characters&#8221;. But in fact, most of us would become the blonde chick (which I absolutetly despise) or some rick&#8217;s wife (crying all over the place).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beanie-Boy</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-506833</link>
		<dc:creator>Beanie-Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-506833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a good show until AMC cut their budget, thats why Darabont got fired. AMC informed Darabont that the budget was going to be cut in half for each episode and they asked him to shoot the season in order one episode at a time, where Darabont was shooting the first season like one big movie. Then they asked/told him to have the characters be inside for the majority of the season, with the zombies banging on the windows and doors, AMC said it would save alot of money on makeup for the zombies; this is why we havent seen very many this season. It is a great show but it is lagging right now due to AMC being cheap bastards. All of the writers/creators for other hit AMC shows like Mad Men have said that AMC is all of a sudden cutting the budgets on all their shows. The actors for Walking Dead were also instructed not to mention the firing of Frank Darabont to the media, and being a character on a zombie show the actors knew it wouldnt be very hard to be killed off if they did speak up. Bullshit AMC, you have tried to give your golden goose an enema and now all the viewers have to pay the consequences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good show until AMC cut their budget, thats why Darabont got fired. AMC informed Darabont that the budget was going to be cut in half for each episode and they asked him to shoot the season in order one episode at a time, where Darabont was shooting the first season like one big movie. Then they asked/told him to have the characters be inside for the majority of the season, with the zombies banging on the windows and doors, AMC said it would save alot of money on makeup for the zombies; this is why we havent seen very many this season. It is a great show but it is lagging right now due to AMC being cheap bastards. All of the writers/creators for other hit AMC shows like Mad Men have said that AMC is all of a sudden cutting the budgets on all their shows. The actors for Walking Dead were also instructed not to mention the firing of Frank Darabont to the media, and being a character on a zombie show the actors knew it wouldnt be very hard to be killed off if they did speak up. Bullshit AMC, you have tried to give your golden goose an enema and now all the viewers have to pay the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2011/11/14/debate-of-the-day-is-the-walking-dead-a-good-show/#comment-506798</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/?p=48942#comment-506798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  It looks like people have a lot to say about this show.  I agree with Jason.  I enjoy the show, so who cares if it&#039;s &quot;good&quot; or not?  BTW has anyone seen Hell on Wheels? Pretty good if you ask me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  It looks like people have a lot to say about this show.  I agree with Jason.  I enjoy the show, so who cares if it&#8217;s &#8220;good&#8221; or not?  BTW has anyone seen Hell on Wheels? Pretty good if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/301 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.unrealitymag.com

 Served from: $http_host @ 2013-05-24 01:15:15 by W3 Total Cache -->