May 03 2011

A Gallery of Randy Atwood’s Phenomenal Photorealistic Pencil Pieces

Published by at 12:00 pm under Images,Movies

Usually when we talk about photorealism, we’re showcasing some particularly well rendered CGI or something of the like. I would have never thought the same sort of effect was achievable with a mere pencil.

But I’ve since been introduced to Randy Atwood, a talented artist who makes art that could very well be a photograph, despite being entirely created from the lead of a pencil. It’s so real, it’s almost eerie, and his collection of celebrity portraits is one of the best I’ve ever featured on the site here.

You’ll find the rest of them below, and I’m guessing you’ll be able to identify most of them, though a few may allude you. First person to name them all gets +50 internet points.





More Unreal Posts


15 responses so far

15 Responses to “A Gallery of Randy Atwood’s Phenomenal Photorealistic Pencil Pieces”

  1. Samon 03 May 2011 at 12:11 pm

    This art is the best art of all the art.

  2. Sideshowon 03 May 2011 at 1:25 pm

    1 Natalie Portman
    2 Adrianna Lima
    3 Hugh Laurie
    4 Arnold Schwarzenegger
    5 Victoria Beckham
    6 Matthew Bellamy
    7 Taylor Lautner and Robert Pattinson
    8 Adrianna Lima
    9 Matthew Bellamy
    10 Jack Nicholson
    11 Daniel Radcliffe
    12 Sean Connery
    13 Candice Swanepoel
    14 Audrey Hepburn
    15 Dennis Quaid
    16 Look it’s Jackie Chan!
    17 Hugh Jackman
    18 Mary Elizabeth Winstead
    19 James Purefoy?
    20 Jack Black

  3. Jasonon 03 May 2011 at 1:51 pm

    Was pretty sure fourth from the bottom was The Boss.

  4. ulisseson 03 May 2011 at 1:55 pm

    try the argentinian artist called godiex.

  5. Sara C.on 03 May 2011 at 3:36 pm

    The Sean Connery one is particularly ridiculous. His eye is wet, for chrissakes.

  6. Sharon 03 May 2011 at 9:02 pm

    Is the second to the last Hugh Jackman?

  7. Games Proon 04 May 2011 at 5:17 am

    @Sara C. Ridiculous??? Can you make it better if you do it yourself?

  8. tubeon 04 May 2011 at 9:13 am

    Sara C, met ridicilous good. Because that one is awesome. But his eye is a little wet, THAT is AWESOME

  9. Guy Incognitoon 04 May 2011 at 10:55 am

    You got it Sideshow. And yes that is James Purefoy. Only thing you got wrond was the spelling of Adriana Lima.

  10. Sideshowon 04 May 2011 at 11:12 am

    My bad.

    50 internet points?

  11. Paul Tassion 04 May 2011 at 11:30 am

    Yes, you win them. Don’t spend them all in one place! I can’t believe you even got Purefoy.

  12. xxon 07 May 2011 at 1:05 am

    The pieces are good forms of mimcry, and nothing else. These were 100% based off of photos – so why the duplication of effort? There’s no interpretation here, so I see no art. Just an exercise in precision – albeit very good precision.

  13. orinocoon 26 Jun 2011 at 11:08 am

    XX Your comment seems to come from envy and nothing more

  14. Ajaon 26 Jun 2011 at 5:40 pm

    In the art world we have a term for these kinds of artists- ‘Xeroxes” or “Photocopiers.” XX is right, this is not considered to be of the greatest skill in art, but rather the simplest. These pieces are not too hard to make, just time-consuming, you already have the photo, and the tools, you just need to make sure everything is aligned and the values are right. If you put this kind of stuff in your portfolio, you will be laughed at.

    This falls under ‘photo-realism,’ or even ‘hyper-realism’ which is an art movement, but these pieces are a very poor example of that. I have seen it done much better and more creatively, look at Chuck Close or John Salt – they have stunning work.

    But this type of stuff is very inferior. It is done by those who have no creativity or inspiration, they just show off their skills to amuse others.

    The most impressive pieces of art require creativity, uniqueness, ingenuity, – the skill just allows it to come to existence.

  15. Linda Martinon 09 Jul 2011 at 6:25 pm

    in the art world, one artist would never tell another artist what art is. a true artist would never even entertain the thought that one method of producing art is inferior or superior to another. art is what you feel. and we all feel something different in our relationship to the world. how we project what we feel is legitimate – no matter the method. since the beginning of time, mankind has sought to replicate the scenes he saw and used whatever tools he had at hand to do so. as early as the fifteenth century, artists began using the camera obscura to produce photorealistic paintings. the camera lucida was used as early as the 18th century for the same reason. humans have always been interested in portraiture and museums worldwide are filled with paintings and drawings of kings and commoners alike. and all of them done in infinite styles and media. photorealism is a skill, and not all artists are able to draw in this manner. as a teacher of the genre, i know this all too well. some students are able to discern nuances in a photograph that the average eye can not. randy atwood’s artwork is remarkable. his drawings’ range of values, depths and textures speak to this artist’s excellent drawing ability.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Categories

Unreal Sites

Archives

Disclaimer

Privacy