when little kids heard that mw2 was a noob friendly game, they all went to play it. Now Halo doesn’t have that annoying experience, but mw2 has another stupid feature.
maybe the geniuses should have had a beta.
oh and fatnugg1g, you just helped prove the mw2 players have a low iq theory. and the white kids act black theory.

Article was obviously written by an Xbox fanboy, with a inferiority complex.

Here’s ye thing I am good at halo. I mean give me a battle rifle and 90% of the time I will out BR you and taking I am very confident taking on two people at once.

So switching over to call of duty I found very annoying. I found myself getting shot from behind every corner until I played each level to realize where people hide. The amount of camping slows the game down and it’s boring, but I found to stay alive you have to be cautious. It’s fun, just different. I don’t think I would play after I prestiged the first time though. I mean the game is the same thing over and over and it doesn’t matter if you’re good or bot you’re going to gain XP to prestige which is the point of multiplyer.

Halo on the other hand is more team orientated. I mean you set yourself up in a party of people an you get to know how people play. The goal is to win and not to gain XP. It makes each match more meaningful. H3 has the military ranking fr XP, which to me doesn’t mean shit. A general is nothing unless he’s a 50, it just means he played more games. But like COD it let’s noobs feel important.

Only gripe I have about H3 is all the maps you have to buy and the maps suck. They are horrible levels to play on.

And I know this is all nosensical rambling, but like mentioned above it takes skill to kill people on halo and not a BS knife or shotgun blast in COD. In halo atleast you can sidestep the shotgun and punch him (although doesn’t work as well as in halo 2). The fact is there’s more things you can do in halo.