As for the article, if she would like to help children charities, then good for her. I don’t care if it is a publicity stunt or whatever, but as long as it helps kids I’m for it.

As for going nude, I’ll leave that to the young crowd. My last Playboy purchase was for the Claudia Christian spread, so that dates me. At least she had some real acting chops among her physical assets.

Now, I’d also like to point out that before the internet encroached in our lives in such an omnipresent way, and every bit of tiny info wasn’t chucked on some blog to be blown up to world-wide proportions, Angelina Jolie (sorry for the obvious comparison) was walking the exact same tightrope of public flaunting. Only we didn’t get to tire of her because she wasn’t as much crammed down our throats all the time AND there were some other promising actresses vying for our attention, that weren’t spending mornings in the gutter recovering from orgies and binge-drinking like they are now, almost ten years later.

I believe a lot of the hypoe surrounding this girl isn’t of her own doing, certainly because the media-machine has become such a vicious bullcrap-churning monster. Of course she’s surfing on the wave, she’s young, beautiful and ambitious, she’d be a fool not to make the most of it.

And, like I already posted somewhere on here before, I’m gay, so I’m not taking a moral highground because of possible hopeful ta-ta ownage or desperate late-night troll-fapping. I’m just tired of people complaining about her, because I believe she may have a nice potential, and yeah, I like looking at hot girls. And in my defense, I’m not some shallow prancing queen that’s only titillated by Marilyniesque sex-kittens that play in loud action movies. I happen to be a huge fan of Bryce Dallas-Howard, Blake Lively and Jennifer Connelly.

So, if everybody just stopped jumping on the hate-bandwagon and maybe stopped googling or youtubing her constantly, we might actually enjoy her face on a screen that is not accompanied by a keyboard.

Now, she might well go naked in a film in the next couple years, but that’s a completely different thing than posing in Playboy. If you actually say you believe that she’s going to pose in Playboy within a year you’re either playing along (which I really hope the people in this thread are doing) or really stupid and too wrapped up in giddy celebrity-hatred to think with any rationality based in fact.

And before anyone accuses me, no, I am neither fan of Megan Fox or Transformers at all. I just live in the real world.

With her skyrocketing ego, she’s going to actually think she’s an actress worth getting an Oscar, and some producer is gonna butter her up to be in his “oscarbait” film, knowing full well that when Megan Fox shows her ta-tas “for Art”, the box office is going to go through the roof.

Actually, I bet it’ll make so much the increasingly desperate Academy Awards will buckle under the pressure and nominate her. No win, but it’ll still be sad. Everything but her showing her ta-tas that is.

Butterfly, I concur my man.

And Gill, unfortunately I think you’re right.