<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: I Just Finshed King&#8217;s The Stand and I Think the Ending Sucked</title> <atom:link href="http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: BillS</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-665177</link> <dc:creator>BillS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:30:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-665177</guid> <description>I’m a little surprised by the people who criticize the ending of The Stand because Stephen King employs a deus ex machina to resolve it.  Meanwhile they missed that it was God’s hand that wiped out over 99 percent of the population in the first place.The Stand is very similar to the biblical story of Noah’s Ark.  Instead of a super-flu, God creates a great flood that cleanses the earth; laying waste most of humanity, while sparing none but a handful of good people and animals, of course.  What’s different in The Stand is that this time, the Devil has a dog in the fight named Randall Flagg and Mother Abigail, his level adversary, represents the side of God as the leader of the Free Zone.  So we wind up with two societies, one good, one evil, both who’s own choices will make its fate and determine who will inherit the earth.  HEAVY; and it’s important to note that King seems to be making a point by having God reboot civilization by means of its own evil invention. Poetic.Several readers are of the opinion that the ending trivializes the Free Zone’s heroic and epic journey to halt the threat of those on the other side of the fence, that fence being the Rocky Mountains no less.  If you’ve read this book and you came to that conclusion yourself, then it’s no wonder why you’d feel let down.So, here’s what I think some of you missed.  If the Free Zone hadn’t sent Stu, Larry, Glen and Ralph to Las Vegas to stand against Randall Flagg and his minions, then Randall’s anger wouldn’t have led him to expose the depth of his depravity by orchestrating the public torture and execution of both surviving Free Zoners Larry Underwood and Ralph Brentner.  It was this act of barbarity that drove minion Whitney Horgan to protest in front of the public gathering and it was in that moment of humility and feelings of betrayal that Randall, like everyone else who had survived the flu epidemic, made a choice.  Using his magic he produced a hot blue ball of lightening, made for ruin.  His choice was revenge.Randall Flagg worked his evil invention both to kill Whitney and to amaze the now turning crowd back into complacency.  At that same moment Trashy shows up with his own device, a surprise for his leader, an A-Bomb.  So while Randall, distracted, turned his attention towards this unwanted hazardous gift, God’s hand once again used two more of mankind’s devices of destruction, combined together against all of neo-western society,  and vaporized Las Vegas, blowing it’s radiation westward, leaving the Free Zone to inherit the earth.  Job finished, the Ark gently comes to rest on top of Mount Ararat.If you still don’t get the ending, it’s that King seems to believe that it’s us who ultimately decides our own future, but it’s the righteous man (baby can you dig) who will be handed the keys to that future.  That much God will make sure of.  I guess it didn’t have to go down this way, but that’s how God rolls in the universe according to King.  Randall Flagg had his chance and so did his followers, but the good people of the Free Zone brought out their true nature and wrong choices were made.  Personally, I thought it was a pretty cool conclusion and it was the perfect ending to a perfect novel.  I’m sorry if you’re experience “sucked”.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a little surprised by the people who criticize the ending of The Stand because Stephen King employs a deus ex machina to resolve it.  Meanwhile they missed that it was God’s hand that wiped out over 99 percent of the population in the first place.</p><p>The Stand is very similar to the biblical story of Noah’s Ark.  Instead of a super-flu, God creates a great flood that cleanses the earth; laying waste most of humanity, while sparing none but a handful of good people and animals, of course.  What’s different in The Stand is that this time, the Devil has a dog in the fight named Randall Flagg and Mother Abigail, his level adversary, represents the side of God as the leader of the Free Zone.  So we wind up with two societies, one good, one evil, both who’s own choices will make its fate and determine who will inherit the earth.  HEAVY; and it’s important to note that King seems to be making a point by having God reboot civilization by means of its own evil invention. Poetic.</p><p>Several readers are of the opinion that the ending trivializes the Free Zone’s heroic and epic journey to halt the threat of those on the other side of the fence, that fence being the Rocky Mountains no less.  If you’ve read this book and you came to that conclusion yourself, then it’s no wonder why you’d feel let down.</p><p>So, here’s what I think some of you missed.  If the Free Zone hadn’t sent Stu, Larry, Glen and Ralph to Las Vegas to stand against Randall Flagg and his minions, then Randall’s anger wouldn’t have led him to expose the depth of his depravity by orchestrating the public torture and execution of both surviving Free Zoners Larry Underwood and Ralph Brentner.  It was this act of barbarity that drove minion Whitney Horgan to protest in front of the public gathering and it was in that moment of humility and feelings of betrayal that Randall, like everyone else who had survived the flu epidemic, made a choice.  Using his magic he produced a hot blue ball of lightening, made for ruin.  His choice was revenge.</p><p>Randall Flagg worked his evil invention both to kill Whitney and to amaze the now turning crowd back into complacency.  At that same moment Trashy shows up with his own device, a surprise for his leader, an A-Bomb.  So while Randall, distracted, turned his attention towards this unwanted hazardous gift, God’s hand once again used two more of mankind’s devices of destruction, combined together against all of neo-western society,  and vaporized Las Vegas, blowing it’s radiation westward, leaving the Free Zone to inherit the earth.  Job finished, the Ark gently comes to rest on top of Mount Ararat.</p><p>If you still don’t get the ending, it’s that King seems to believe that it’s us who ultimately decides our own future, but it’s the righteous man (baby can you dig) who will be handed the keys to that future.  That much God will make sure of.  I guess it didn’t have to go down this way, but that’s how God rolls in the universe according to King.  Randall Flagg had his chance and so did his followers, but the good people of the Free Zone brought out their true nature and wrong choices were made.  Personally, I thought it was a pretty cool conclusion and it was the perfect ending to a perfect novel.  I’m sorry if you’re experience “sucked”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JoMan</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-354325</link> <dc:creator>JoMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:27:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-354325</guid> <description>King said in an interview he wanted GOD to be a major character in the book, rather than an abstract concept that shuns vampires when they see a cross. He thought &quot;why is God only important in the form of the cross, why is his influence not more fleshed out&quot;. So, in this story he made God an ongoing part of the story and an obvious (often thought as overly-obvious) appearance by God at the end as having been involved in the plight of the &quot;good side.&quot; The &quot;overly-obvious&quot; work of God at the end of the story was meant to &quot;shine a light&quot; on King&#039;s desire to make God a character in the story. To make God more interpretive or metaphorical, as in many stories, such as LOTR, was just not on his agenda. Did it work well, not really, but, I guess, King wanted it and did it, for good or bad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King said in an interview he wanted GOD to be a major character in the book, rather than an abstract concept that shuns vampires when they see a cross. He thought &#8220;why is God only important in the form of the cross, why is his influence not more fleshed out&#8221;. So, in this story he made God an ongoing part of the story and an obvious (often thought as overly-obvious) appearance by God at the end as having been involved in the plight of the &#8220;good side.&#8221; The &#8220;overly-obvious&#8221; work of God at the end of the story was meant to &#8220;shine a light&#8221; on King&#8217;s desire to make God a character in the story. To make God more interpretive or metaphorical, as in many stories, such as LOTR, was just not on his agenda. Did it work well, not really, but, I guess, King wanted it and did it, for good or bad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-158746</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:21:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-158746</guid> <description>Yeah, I agree - The Stand as a book was amazing... until the end. But if you are a King fan, you expect it somewhat. He definitely runs out of steam and ideas due to his writing approach. He never plans a plot according to On Writing (or rarely - Maximum Overdrive he actually did plan out). The downside of that approach is sometimes you write your characters (and story) into a corner and the only way out is to simply end it with a plot device. To me, it makes the book flawed and only half of what it could have been. His biggest flop on that weakness though to me was IT, come on - it was an alien? Really? It surprises me the Stand actually got by his initial readers, agent and editor with such a crappy ending - such a shame.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree &#8211; The Stand as a book was amazing&#8230; until the end. But if you are a King fan, you expect it somewhat. He definitely runs out of steam and ideas due to his writing approach. He never plans a plot according to On Writing (or rarely &#8211; Maximum Overdrive he actually did plan out). The downside of that approach is sometimes you write your characters (and story) into a corner and the only way out is to simply end it with a plot device. To me, it makes the book flawed and only half of what it could have been. His biggest flop on that weakness though to me was IT, come on &#8211; it was an alien? Really? It surprises me the Stand actually got by his initial readers, agent and editor with such a crappy ending &#8211; such a shame.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Addy</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-132868</link> <dc:creator>Addy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:09:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-132868</guid> <description>I fully agree with your analysis of &#039;The Stand&#039; , in fact , it is pretty much how I felt about the ending , which was a major disappointment after a fantastic buildup.Like you say , King&#039;s main strength is his characterisation and fleshing out the little idiosyncrasies all readers love. &#039;The Stand&#039; is purported to be his magnum opus , and to an extent it is , but the ending is a major blemish which is hard to ignore.Larry Underwood was a character I had come to really like and you would think there was redemption at the end for him(and I don&#039;t mean death by the &#039;hand of god&#039;) but he was swiftly eliminated along with all the major characters except Stu to facilitate an unsatisfying ending. Nick Andros , who was a deaf-mute , was also killed off in a blast. Realistic endings are nice but in this case it was obvious that King had no clue how to end what he had started , so he decided to cop out by killing everybody.A better plot could have had two growing groups led by two opposing forces , developing independently of each other , starting society from the very beginning in their own way and finally meeting in a grand battle , good vs evil , god vs satan etc etc. It would have made it even longer but I think that point is moot because it was pretty long to begin with.I have to say , i found it massively underwhelming after the fantastic first half with Captain Trips and how it spread through America and the superb character development(King is the best at it , no doubt). It did not even make sense , I am afraid.
I also dislike the way King introduces dispensable characters(Dayna , Judge , Weizak) for the sole purpose of &#039;increasing the body count&#039; so to speak.Anyway , the book was like a great evening drinking fine wine only to end up throwing up at the end of it, that is how I feel about it.
:)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with your analysis of &#8216;The Stand&#8217; , in fact , it is pretty much how I felt about the ending , which was a major disappointment after a fantastic buildup.</p><p>Like you say , King&#8217;s main strength is his characterisation and fleshing out the little idiosyncrasies all readers love. &#8216;The Stand&#8217; is purported to be his magnum opus , and to an extent it is , but the ending is a major blemish which is hard to ignore.</p><p>Larry Underwood was a character I had come to really like and you would think there was redemption at the end for him(and I don&#8217;t mean death by the &#8216;hand of god&#8217;) but he was swiftly eliminated along with all the major characters except Stu to facilitate an unsatisfying ending. Nick Andros , who was a deaf-mute , was also killed off in a blast. Realistic endings are nice but in this case it was obvious that King had no clue how to end what he had started , so he decided to cop out by killing everybody.</p><p>A better plot could have had two growing groups led by two opposing forces , developing independently of each other , starting society from the very beginning in their own way and finally meeting in a grand battle , good vs evil , god vs satan etc etc. It would have made it even longer but I think that point is moot because it was pretty long to begin with.</p><p>I have to say , i found it massively underwhelming after the fantastic first half with Captain Trips and how it spread through America and the superb character development(King is the best at it , no doubt). It did not even make sense , I am afraid.<br
/> I also dislike the way King introduces dispensable characters(Dayna , Judge , Weizak) for the sole purpose of &#8216;increasing the body count&#8217; so to speak.</p><p>Anyway , the book was like a great evening drinking fine wine only to end up throwing up at the end of it, that is how I feel about it.<br
/> <img
src='http://unrealitymag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Madison</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-126619</link> <dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-126619</guid> <description>@ archwolfSorry, but character arc and a satisfying ending aren&#039;t mutually exclusive.Hubris?  Hardly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ archwolf</p><p>Sorry, but character arc and a satisfying ending aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive.</p><p>Hubris?  Hardly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: archworf</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-126615</link> <dc:creator>archworf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:59:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-126615</guid> <description>What hubris to assume &quot;the end&quot; of the book is over a hundred pages away from the last words King wrote! Stu&#039;s return is not epilogue but the completion of the protagonist&#039;s arc.                                                                 Did Tolkien (or even Jackson, who truncated &quot;The Ordering of The Shire&quot;) say &quot;Right, mate, the Ring is gone, THE END. Who cares about the PEOPLE WHO THE BOOK IS ABOUT?&quot;                                     Tell you what, guys, write ONE BOOK that anybody other than a loved one could even finish, then get back to me before blogging  &quot; I Just Complete Misunderstood CARRIE and Don&#039;t Know Why it Didn&#039;t End When The Bucket of Pig Blood Hit Tommy in the Head ?!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What hubris to assume &#8220;the end&#8221; of the book is over a hundred pages away from the last words King wrote! Stu&#8217;s return is not epilogue but the completion of the protagonist&#8217;s arc.                                                                 Did Tolkien (or even Jackson, who truncated &#8220;The Ordering of The Shire&#8221;) say &#8220;Right, mate, the Ring is gone, THE END. Who cares about the PEOPLE WHO THE BOOK IS ABOUT?&#8221;                                     Tell you what, guys, write ONE BOOK that anybody other than a loved one could even finish, then get back to me before blogging  &#8221; I Just Complete Misunderstood CARRIE and Don&#8217;t Know Why it Didn&#8217;t End When The Bucket of Pig Blood Hit Tommy in the Head ?!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jose</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-93399</link> <dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:56:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-93399</guid> <description>Ending stupid.  Don&#039;t bother to read.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ending stupid.  Don&#8217;t bother to read.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drikkirichards</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-66224</link> <dc:creator>Drikkirichards</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:26:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-66224</guid> <description>The ending was kind of a letdown but not that unusual, and telegraphed if you were paying attention. I&#039;ve watched A LOT of movies and it is a common theme that as the capital EVIL gets bigger and bigger it starts to lose track of things like Flags holes in in &#039;vision&#039; of things. Flag not &#039;seeing&#039; Nadine killing herself. The eye of mordor(sp?) not seeing Froto coming. I could name other such plot devices in other movies.  Evil gets careless and the Good guys manage to escape or at least the Evil is punished. The energy was supposed to kill the good guys but Flag lost control to the ultimate good. The nuke was not set off by Trash the &#039;Hand of God&#039;(was it really even a hand or was that just imagined by one of the characters?)set it off, as was mentioned in a previous post. The prisoners KNEW their trip was a sacrifice that was somehow necessary to keep the others safe also telegraphed in the lead in to the end. The moral of King&#039;s story&#039;s are often sophomoric but they are like the new age fairy tales and the morals of old being retold in new stories. Morals can be so simplistic as a few (or 1 person as in Terminator 2 or Armageddon)good people must sacrifice themselves for the good of the many. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few as a famous star trek quote.  I&#039;m so far down on the comments prolly no one will see this but i have read this book quite a few times and have seen something new in it each time I read it. I read it when i was in jr high and in high school and then the unabridged version when i was in my mid twenties and different things stood out to me at different times. Definitely a unique book for such a.. I can&#039;t think of a word that pegs King he is definitely a unique writer outstanding horror and fantasy yet some of his books fall into neither category but the one thing they all seem to have in common they make you think. I think his biggest problem may be the very fact that he writes so much, his self described diarrhea of the word processor, that he starts to copy himself(It and Tommyknockers when broken down to a single sentence description would be the same sentence nearly) At times, I think, he does write himself into a corner. The Dark Tower series ending was a HUGE disappointment but the journey was exciting. I think that ending was rushed because of real life events not by planning, he was trying to end a story before his own life story ended. Fortunately he survived and maybe and unabridged version will appear that makes the ending make more sense. I digress, The Stand was an excellent book and the Mini Series while good also trivializes some aspects and at the same time I don&#039;t think a feature of only Two hours or so would come close to doing it justice IMO. You can respond to me a drikkirichards@yahoo.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ending was kind of a letdown but not that unusual, and telegraphed if you were paying attention. I&#8217;ve watched A LOT of movies and it is a common theme that as the capital EVIL gets bigger and bigger it starts to lose track of things like Flags holes in in &#8216;vision&#8217; of things. Flag not &#8216;seeing&#8217; Nadine killing herself. The eye of mordor(sp?) not seeing Froto coming. I could name other such plot devices in other movies.  Evil gets careless and the Good guys manage to escape or at least the Evil is punished. The energy was supposed to kill the good guys but Flag lost control to the ultimate good. The nuke was not set off by Trash the &#8216;Hand of God&#8217;(was it really even a hand or was that just imagined by one of the characters?)set it off, as was mentioned in a previous post. The prisoners KNEW their trip was a sacrifice that was somehow necessary to keep the others safe also telegraphed in the lead in to the end. The moral of King&#8217;s story&#8217;s are often sophomoric but they are like the new age fairy tales and the morals of old being retold in new stories. Morals can be so simplistic as a few (or 1 person as in Terminator 2 or Armageddon)good people must sacrifice themselves for the good of the many. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few as a famous star trek quote.  I&#8217;m so far down on the comments prolly no one will see this but i have read this book quite a few times and have seen something new in it each time I read it. I read it when i was in jr high and in high school and then the unabridged version when i was in my mid twenties and different things stood out to me at different times. Definitely a unique book for such a.. I can&#8217;t think of a word that pegs King he is definitely a unique writer outstanding horror and fantasy yet some of his books fall into neither category but the one thing they all seem to have in common they make you think. I think his biggest problem may be the very fact that he writes so much, his self described diarrhea of the word processor, that he starts to copy himself(It and Tommyknockers when broken down to a single sentence description would be the same sentence nearly) At times, I think, he does write himself into a corner. The Dark Tower series ending was a HUGE disappointment but the journey was exciting. I think that ending was rushed because of real life events not by planning, he was trying to end a story before his own life story ended. Fortunately he survived and maybe and unabridged version will appear that makes the ending make more sense. I digress, The Stand was an excellent book and the Mini Series while good also trivializes some aspects and at the same time I don&#8217;t think a feature of only Two hours or so would come close to doing it justice IMO. You can respond to me a <a
href="mailto:drikkirichards@yahoo.com">drikkirichards@yahoo.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Madison</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-43493</link> <dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-43493</guid> <description>@ RunningFoxI don&#039;t think I agree with your interpretation.  If it wasn&#039;t God that set off the nuke, then what was it?  It was a blue ball of flame - or something like that - and was clearly supernatural in nature.  It wasn&#039;t figurative, because everyone saw it.  The hand itself may have been, but I doubt it based simply on people already being aware of the supernatural.I may have to see the movie version!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ RunningFox</p><p>I don&#8217;t think I agree with your interpretation.  If it wasn&#8217;t God that set off the nuke, then what was it?  It was a blue ball of flame &#8211; or something like that &#8211; and was clearly supernatural in nature.  It wasn&#8217;t figurative, because everyone saw it.  The hand itself may have been, but I doubt it based simply on people already being aware of the supernatural.</p><p>I may have to see the movie version!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RunningFox</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-43435</link> <dc:creator>RunningFox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:18:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/09/14/i-just-finshed-kings-the-stand-and-i-think-the-ending-sucked/#comment-43435</guid> <description>I just finished The Stand.  Been reading reviews to find out what interpretations people had of the ending.  Most seem disappointed at the Deu Ex Machina ending to the story and I can undersatnd why.  On the one hand, it does appear an awful lot like King simply ran out of steam and had God himself come down and bring about the end.So did I like the ending?  I remain undecided.  But here&#039;s my interpretation:  First of all, I&#039;m not so sure &quot;The Hand of God&quot; in literal terms was responsible for setting off the Nuke.  I&#039;m sure it was God who intervened, but did he reveal himself as a Hand, like He did in the cheesy movie version?  No, I don&#039;t think he did.  From what I remember, Ralph looked up into the sky at the ball of light, and his faith, his longing for God at that moment to &quot;show up&quot; is what lead him to &quot;believe&quot; he saw the Hand of God.  And because Larry was in the same state of mind, he saw the same thing too. It isn&#039;t mentioned as far as I can remember that anyone else actually SAW the Hand of God at all.I&#039;m a big fan of the TV show Lost, and I love how ambigious the show is.  But I&#039;m afraid the religious aspects of the show were a bit too on the nose for me regardless of whatever form God actually appeard in.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished The Stand.  Been reading reviews to find out what interpretations people had of the ending.  Most seem disappointed at the Deu Ex Machina ending to the story and I can undersatnd why.  On the one hand, it does appear an awful lot like King simply ran out of steam and had God himself come down and bring about the end.</p><p>So did I like the ending?  I remain undecided.  But here&#8217;s my interpretation:  First of all, I&#8217;m not so sure &#8220;The Hand of God&#8221; in literal terms was responsible for setting off the Nuke.  I&#8217;m sure it was God who intervened, but did he reveal himself as a Hand, like He did in the cheesy movie version?  No, I don&#8217;t think he did.  From what I remember, Ralph looked up into the sky at the ball of light, and his faith, his longing for God at that moment to &#8220;show up&#8221; is what lead him to &#8220;believe&#8221; he saw the Hand of God.  And because Larry was in the same state of mind, he saw the same thing too. It isn&#8217;t mentioned as far as I can remember that anyone else actually SAW the Hand of God at all.</p><p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the TV show Lost, and I love how ambigious the show is.  But I&#8217;m afraid the religious aspects of the show were a bit too on the nose for me regardless of whatever form God actually appeard in.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: unrealitymag.com @ 2012-05-26 07:27:11 -->
