Comments on: Which Most Expensive Movie Sucked the Most?

By: Buddy Cool

Buddy Cool — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:52:39 +0000

Two words; BATTLEFIELD EARTH!

Battlefield Earth grossed $21,471,685 in the United States and Canada and a total of $29,725,663 worldwide, falling well short of its $75 million production budget and $20 million in estimated marketing costs.

Nuff said.

By: Madison

Madison — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:05:06 +0000

@ Nickjaa

I don’t think T3 was pretty good, but I do think it was a lot better than X3 and Spidey 3. Spidey 3 is the worst of that bunch by a lot, I think.

By: Nickjaa

Nickjaa — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:10:28 +0000

I think Terminator 3 was pretty good, all things considered. A fun film, no T2 of course but a fun film. Spider-man 3 blew, but I think out of the 3 films nominated X-Men 3 was the worst. Killing half the main characters does not a good movie make, Brett Ratner. Also, it was bad.

By: Linkheroes: Submit Links, Add Upload Submit, Funny Game Movie TV Links, Heroes | Linkheroes.com

Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:22:06 +0000

[...] A Helpful Tutorial on The Most Diffcult Video Game Ever Movies: Which Most Expensive Movie Sucked the Most? Internet: Top 10: Fun Summer Gadgets 2009 Movies: Everything You Ever Wanted To [...]

By: Q8248494

Q8248494 — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:58:36 +0000

I was really hoping that in this thread I would find someone else who saw Spiderman 2 for the piece of garbage that it was. I agree that Spiderman 3 was the worst of them, but I don’t see how standing infront of the flag is cliche, but having a subway full of civilians who are willing to die for you and keep your secret identity seems justifiable to everyone. I think that both Spiderman 2 and 3 were the worst of the list.

By: Dude

Dude — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:29:58 +0000

I wouldn’t go so hard on T3 for me it was ok movie, Spider-Man 3 definitely the worst and part when spidey stands and in back is big USA flag well that only goes to show how much cliche and ass kissing and just down right indulging to less smart part of the audience was there in the movie.

And what they did to the Venom well that just wrong! Guaranteed ticket to hell if you ask me cuz I feel deep in my heart that God is comics fan.

By: MacGyver1138

MacGyver1138 — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:34:49 +0000

I don’t think King Kong was so bad. It can’t hold up to the original, because that was just to mind-blowing for its time and remakes lose a lot of magic, but it was a passable film. Spider-Man 3 was just awful, especially after the brilliance of Spider-Man 2.

By: Nattyb

Nattyb — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:57:29 +0000

I don’t know, because it sucked

Seriously though, I just think it was a giant mish mosh of special effects and I didn’t “feel” anything in the movie.

In the one with Jeff Bridges there was sympathy and the Gorilla at least had a human face…. sort of. I felt compassion a bit more.

I mean you sort of do in this one but not to the same extent.

And quite frankly Adrien Brody’s character isn’t even really necessary.

Eh, I just didn’t like it.

By: Madison

Madison — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:26:50 +0000

Spider-Man 3 was horrible, as was the third X-Men movie. Total abortions, the two of them. Say what you want about King Kong, but it’s in a totally different league than the two of them. Sure, it could have done without the first 45 minutes, but I don’t understand why everyone is so hard on that movie.

By: Nattyb

Nattyb — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:17:00 +0000

I didn’t include that? Blasphemy. Sorry guys, and it was the first one I thought of too.