<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 10 of the Most Annoying Supporting Characters In TV Sitcom History</title> <atom:link href="http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-17696</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:07:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-17696</guid> <description>I find it ironic that I found this article with a web search for &quot;Buddy Lembeck greatest tv characters&quot;. I think he was the pinnacle of TV sidekicks, and the ONLY reason to watch that otherwise lame-ass show (and if you say &quot;Nicole Eggert&quot; just buy &quot;Blow Up&quot; instead. You&#039;ll thank me).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic that I found this article with a web search for &#8220;Buddy Lembeck greatest tv characters&#8221;. I think he was the pinnacle of TV sidekicks, and the ONLY reason to watch that otherwise lame-ass show (and if you say &#8220;Nicole Eggert&#8221; just buy &#8220;Blow Up&#8221; instead. You&#8217;ll thank me).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dead Serious</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12198</link> <dc:creator>Dead Serious</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:57:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12198</guid> <description>I may be wrong on this but I&#039;m pretty sure Paul Pfeiffer lost his virginity BEFORE Kevin did, while the other guys were trying to sneak into an R movie.Also, Buddy Lembeck is a comedy genius.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be wrong on this but I&#8217;m pretty sure Paul Pfeiffer lost his virginity BEFORE Kevin did, while the other guys were trying to sneak into an R movie.</p><p>Also, Buddy Lembeck is a comedy genius.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wilson</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12102</link> <dc:creator>Wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:05:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12102</guid> <description>Dude, LEAVE ROSARIO ALONE!!!Just kidding</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, LEAVE ROSARIO ALONE!!!</p><p>Just kidding</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Warren</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12058</link> <dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12058</guid> <description>Seriously Bull? You didn&#039;t like Bull? I refuse to listen to such blasphemy!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously Bull? You didn&#8217;t like Bull? I refuse to listen to such blasphemy!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12052</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12052</guid> <description>I agree with all but PAUL??? Kevin would look like a nerd if paul wasnt there to shit on constantly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all but PAUL??? Kevin would look like a nerd if paul wasnt there to shit on constantly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kj</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12048</link> <dc:creator>kj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12048</guid> <description>I know it is your site, your opinion... but BULL???  C&#039;mon I watched that show religiously and he was an integral part of many of the best episodes.  Oh well, opinions are like a-holes, right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it is your site, your opinion&#8230; but BULL???  C&#8217;mon I watched that show religiously and he was an integral part of many of the best episodes.  Oh well, opinions are like a-holes, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The May 21 Hot Link Orgy &#124; Blog of Hilarity</title><link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12046</link> <dc:creator>The May 21 Hot Link Orgy &#124; Blog of Hilarity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:10:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12046</guid> <description>[...] their virginity -The top 5 sex products that really shouldn&#8217;t exist -Handjobs for the future -10 of the most annoying supporting sitcom characters in TV history -Drunkenness and a gun? Great idea! -25 inappropriate Ronald McDonald photos -6 bizarre photos from [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their virginity -The top 5 sex products that really shouldn&#8217;t exist -Handjobs for the future -10 of the most annoying supporting sitcom characters in TV history -Drunkenness and a gun? Great idea! -25 inappropriate Ronald McDonald photos -6 bizarre photos from [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: unrealitymag.com @ 2012-05-26 03:49:28 -->
