<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 of the Most Annoying Supporting Characters In TV Sitcom History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-17696</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-17696</guid>
		<description>I find it ironic that I found this article with a web search for &quot;Buddy Lembeck greatest tv characters&quot;. I think he was the pinnacle of TV sidekicks, and the ONLY reason to watch that otherwise lame-ass show (and if you say &quot;Nicole Eggert&quot; just buy &quot;Blow Up&quot; instead. You&#039;ll thank me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic that I found this article with a web search for &#8220;Buddy Lembeck greatest tv characters&#8221;. I think he was the pinnacle of TV sidekicks, and the ONLY reason to watch that otherwise lame-ass show (and if you say &#8220;Nicole Eggert&#8221; just buy &#8220;Blow Up&#8221; instead. You&#8217;ll thank me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead Serious</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead Serious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12198</guid>
		<description>I may be wrong on this but I&#039;m pretty sure Paul Pfeiffer lost his virginity BEFORE Kevin did, while the other guys were trying to sneak into an R movie.

Also, Buddy Lembeck is a comedy genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be wrong on this but I&#8217;m pretty sure Paul Pfeiffer lost his virginity BEFORE Kevin did, while the other guys were trying to sneak into an R movie.</p>
<p>Also, Buddy Lembeck is a comedy genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12102</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12102</guid>
		<description>Dude, LEAVE ROSARIO ALONE!!!


Just kidding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, LEAVE ROSARIO ALONE!!!</p>
<p>Just kidding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12058</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12058</guid>
		<description>Seriously Bull? You didn&#039;t like Bull? I refuse to listen to such blasphemy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously Bull? You didn&#8217;t like Bull? I refuse to listen to such blasphemy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12052</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12052</guid>
		<description>I agree with all but PAUL??? Kevin would look like a nerd if paul wasnt there to shit on constantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all but PAUL??? Kevin would look like a nerd if paul wasnt there to shit on constantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kj</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12048</link>
		<dc:creator>kj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12048</guid>
		<description>I know it is your site, your opinion... but BULL???  C&#039;mon I watched that show religiously and he was an integral part of many of the best episodes.  Oh well, opinions are like a-holes, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it is your site, your opinion&#8230; but BULL???  C&#8217;mon I watched that show religiously and he was an integral part of many of the best episodes.  Oh well, opinions are like a-holes, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The May 21 Hot Link Orgy &#124; Blog of Hilarity</title>
		<link>http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>The May 21 Hot Link Orgy &#124; Blog of Hilarity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2009/05/21/10-of-the-most-annoying-supporting-characters-in-tv-sitcom-history/#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>[...] their virginity -The top 5 sex products that really shouldn&#8217;t exist -Handjobs for the future -10 of the most annoying supporting sitcom characters in TV history -Drunkenness and a gun? Great idea! -25 inappropriate Ronald McDonald photos -6 bizarre photos from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their virginity -The top 5 sex products that really shouldn&#8217;t exist -Handjobs for the future -10 of the most annoying supporting sitcom characters in TV history -Drunkenness and a gun? Great idea! -25 inappropriate Ronald McDonald photos -6 bizarre photos from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Object Caching 258/262 objects using disk: basic

Served from: unrealitymag.com @ 2012-02-10 04:08:13 -->
